Archive for the ‘News’ Category

The Rise of the Conservative Woman

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Bad Politics and Bad Policy

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Calling All Babies: The Real Experts in the Health Care Debate

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Saturday marked more than a debate on health care reform. It was a battle of cute kids. Yes, you heard me correctly. November 6th was intended as the day when lawmakers would convene over the health care bill and hopefully reach a favorably consensus. Instead, it was a day of distractions and battles between children.

On the Republican side was the party’s latest spokesperson, Maddie, the 7-month child of Rep. John Shadegg’s chief of staff. While Maddie could only coo and fiddle with a microphone, Shadegg did not hesitate to interpret her intended message.

“Maddie likes America because we have freedom here and Maddie believes in patient choice health care,” said Shadegg. “She has come here to say she doesn’t want government to take over health care. She wants to keep her plan.” Okay, let us be honest. Maddie was an adorable addition to the debate; a fresh intermission from matured men and women in primary colored power suits. Yet she was also a distraction – and not the first.  You can view the clip here.

Youth could also be seen on the Democrat side of the debate. Rep. Pete Stark introduced, not one child, but rather two. While he did not attempt to translate their thoughts, Stark did motion to children Hannah and Andrew when speaking about the current bill at hand.

“I encourage each of my colleagues to join me in voting yes,” said Stark, giving a nod to his twins. “I can assure you these guys aren’t going to have to pay for it in the future.”

Is this really what the health care reform debate has come to? Have our political parties really ditched PhD’s and intelligently persuasive arguments for babies? True, what is resolved by the current administration will inevitably affect future generations inclusive of innocent, endearing children. However, presenting children during Saturday’s debate was not solely an embarrassment to Representatives involved, but also likely debased the United States’ reputation abroad.

Our nation already has its share of noticeable flaws: White House intern scandals, scrutiny over Michelle Obama adorning a pair of shorts, just to name a few. After Saturday, however, the U.S. will have the pleasure of defending comments that Representatives are so unable to stand by their opinions that they need toddlers as support mechanisms.

Note to self: next time I am in a meeting with colleagues, and feel threatened, I will recruit the children that I babysit. Maybe then I will win my argument.

******

Kathleen Someah previously attended Kenyon College where she studied English and Political Science.  She is currently an intern with a political think tank where she focuses primarily on issues relating to homeland security.

Hillary and Sarah’s Common Theme

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Meg Whitman Lead Growing for CA Governor

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Room for Improvement: Government Intervention in the H1N1 Pandemic

Friday, October 30th, 2009

There is no shortage of swine flu skeptics. You may hear comments about how H1N1 is no more serious than the seasonal flu, how the whole declaration of swine flu as a “national emergency” is simply a Democrat-affiliated political tactic synchronized with their health “Scare” bill. But in a hearing on Tuesday, held by the House Judiciary Committee on Homeland Security, concerning H1N1 preparedness, Obama’s “national emergency” declaration proved appropriate. Chaired by Rep. Bennie Thompson, (D-MS) and Yvette D. Clarke, (D-NY), members heard statements from authorities concerning assessment of the federal response to the influenza pandemic. There was no lack of evidence that swine flu is a rampant illness taking no prisoners.

Witnesses were grilled on their knowledge concerning measures taken towards preparing the nation for the H1N1 outbreak. State representatives did not resist temptations to drill witnesses on whether or not the United States took substantial measures during the initial influenza scare. While Dr. Nicole Lurie’s initial statement illustrated the federal government’s “successful” response to H1N1, her response to inquiries concerning U.S reactions to the original cases in Mexico proved contrary. Lurie commented on the fact that state and local health officials posed as one of the biggest challenges regarding taking immediate action after the initial outbreaks.

“One thing that has really challenged everyone has been the status of state and local public health officials,” said Lurie, who serves as the assistant secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services. “A chain is as long as its weakest link. We need strong public help on the ground to respond to disease control. The public help has become invisible over the days.”

While public help has been lacking in recent days, one would assume that federal efforts had improved since the onset of outbreaks. However, such assumptions would be false. When asked about the tools for developing H1N1 vaccines, Lurie attested to the notion that “we are using fifty-year old technology” with respect to vaccine production. According to Lurie, scientists are currently using eggs to grow the virus and craft vaccines. Essentially, the rate of vaccine production relies on how well the virus grows in the eggs. While Lurie did site ongoing investment in more advanced technologies, she later stated that these initiatives were not available in time to make vaccines for this pandemic. She cited the need for “more robust manufacturing practices.”

In the second chapter of Tuesday’s hearing, witnesses were asked to discuss the threat of counterfeit H1N1 drugs. This concern was raised in response to recent evidence that 140 misleading drugs are currently on the market, claiming to assist in preventing the spread of swine flu. When asked about these counterfeit antiviral remedies, Marcy Forman, Director of the Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center, a division of DHS, responded that it is “more of an issue of fraudulent representation than counterfeit drugs.”

But the inquiry remains, what about so-called remedies such as Immune Support Formula? This product, distributed by one of Andrew Weil’s companies, promises to ward off H1N1 by supporting one’s immune system. It may be true that such antidotes are harmless, but the real concern lies in the fact that these misrepresenting solutions can cause further confusion in the already frenzied swine flu pandemic. So what is being done to stop this perceived criminal advertisement? Very little. As Forman mentioned in her statement, government officials are “entering a dialogue” with countries suspected of manufacturing counterfeit medications. However, as of last week the FDA warned of over 75 websites geared towards scamming swine flu-wary consumers.

The federal government needs to do more for its people. As we saw with Hurricane Katrina, lack of deeply rooted federal government aid can prove detriment to citizens. Allow the H1N1 pandemic to be, not another Katrina, but rather an opportunity for the United States government to step up to the plate, enhance communication between government agencies, and support U.S. citizens.

*******

Kathleen Someah previously attended Kenyon College where she studied English and Political Science.  She is currently an intern with a political think tank where she focuses primarily on issues relating to homeland security.

Healthcare Through Women’s Economic Lenses

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

Why Energy Independence Must Become the Next Republican Rallying Cry

Thursday, October 29th, 2009

America sends almost a billion dollars per day overseas to buy oil.  When we do, we are directly or indirectly bankrolling dictators who despise us, who reinvest our money to support terrorist groups and who spread anti-American sentiment throughout South America and the Middle East.  Our dollars buy their high-tech weapons arsenals, help them destabilize our allies and fund their anti-American propaganda efforts.  We are literally giving our enemies the wherewithal to attack us and to challenge American leadership internationally. 

Our foreign oil addiction also translates into economic weakness.  As a petroleum-reliant country, the global price of oil affects virtually every aspect of our economy.  Our markets are susceptible to flare-ups of unrest in the Middle East, deliberate manipulations of oil prices by foreign regimes and supply disruptions – whether due to natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina or economic warfare like the oil embargo of 1973.  At a time when we are working to grow our economy, the rising cost of oil will slow those efforts.  Worst of all, the billions we send overseas to purchase oil are dollars that are not buying American products or creating American jobs—instead they are strengthening the economies of our political adversaries and deepening our trade imbalance.

Every American president for over thirty years has promised action on achieving energy independence, but each year the problem grows worse.  It is past time for an effective, united campaign to accomplish this goal, and Republicans should be at the forefront of this effort.   Our plan must be open to all strategies to achieve independence from foreign oil: domestic oil and coal produced and consumed in ecologically responsible ways, bio-fuels, nuclear power, wind, solar, thermal and a host of alternative energy technologies only now coming to market.  America needs to be at the forefront of alternative energy technology and production, not only for the sake of the environment, but for the sake of our national security and economy.

Recently, the American Security Council Foundation, an organization primarily known for its historic role in promoting the philosophy of “peace through strength” during the Reagan Administration, addressed this challenge by launching an initiative called Project Independence, lead by Governor George Pataki.  The goal of Project Independence is to replace every drop of oil that we import from OPEC and Venezuela with domestically-produced energy over the next ten years.  We can achieve this goal by enacting three commonsense initiatives. 

First, we must develop a diversified supply of homegrown energy to replace foreign oil.  The place to start is transportation, which accounts for 71% of our national petroleum consumption.  Without choosing winners and losers, we need to enact national policies that incentivize private sector production of vehicles that run on natural gas, hydrogen, ethanol, biodiesel, electricity and other petroleum alternatives.  Imagine if Congress passed a bill repealing federal income and sales tax collection on the first 5 million affordable cars that achieve a fuel economy of 70 miles per gallon.  These are the bold market-based policies that will get new petroleum alternative technologies to the marketplace more quickly and cheaply.

Second, we must build the infrastructure needed to deliver the energy of the future across America.  In the 1950s the U.S. built the interstate highway system to improve our national security.  In this century we need to make the same commitment to developing an interstate alternative fuel system.  Key initiatives include tax incentives and immediate expensing of capital investment for the installation of alternative fuel pumps at service stations across the country.  Another necessary step is updating the U.S. power grid to handle increased power generation demand due to new technologies like electric cars and the development of renewable energy corridors, which will allow homegrown energy projects like wind and solar farms to flourish.  We need to install a secure and interactive national “smart grid” that supports these projects by improving carrying capacity and allowing utilities to more precisely manage power delivery according to demand.   

Third, we can cut our consumption of foreign oil by simply reducing our overall energy usage.  The most effective way to do that is by improving efficiency and conservation.  Adopting a national “green building” tax credit and requiring federal government agencies to make meaningful reductions in their annual energy consumption are just some of the steps we should take.

The three simple components of Project Independence—developing a diversified supply of homegrown energy, building the energy infrastructure of the future and improving efficiency—aren’t new.  In fact, there have been decades of empty rhetoric supporting such efforts.  A week rarely passes when a prominent politician has not made an announcement concerning a dramatic alternative energy proposal addressing one aspect or another of the energy puzzle.  Unfortunately, politicians on both sides of the aisle have lacked the foresight or commitment to undertake the coordinated, sustained effort necessary to achieve real change. 

It’s time for Republicans to take the lead in demanding that our energy dollars be redirected toward the creation of American energy sector jobs, the development and manufacture of cutting edge alternative energy products that US entrepreneurs can market to the rest of the World, and to building the energy infrastructure needed to support a modern nation.   Let’s make it a top Republican priority to take meaningful action to reverse our nation’s dangerous dependence on foreign oil.  

******

Kerry Murphy Healey, former Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts, serves as Co-Chair of Project Independence, an initiative of the American Security Council Foundation.

We Must Get Our Fiscal House In Order

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

NY-23, of All Places? Defining the Future of the Republican Party

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

Despite the competitive gubernatorial races in the Presidential battleground states of VA and now-bankrupt NJ; one needs to look no further than the upstate New York special election in the 23rd Congressional district to see the true future of the GOP playing out – particularly at the presidential level.  The race stands to highlight the kind of mistakes that will not lead Republicans out of the wilderness anytime soon.

The NY-23 race has become a litmus test for the intra-party struggle between the conservative credentials of lower taxes, less spending, limited government, and job creation, and the go along to get along big-government RINOs (Republicans in Name Only), who have strayed so far from the conservative platform, that they go on to discredit the party’s brand nationally.  And it appears conservative credentials are winning the battle.

In a recent poll conducted by Club for Growth, Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman now leads with 31%, with Democrat Bill Owens at 27% and Republican Dede Scozzafava trailing at 20%.   Armed with high profile endorsements from the likes of Sarah Palin, Steve Forbes, Dick Armey, Michelle Malkin, Fred Thompson, and the latest (and, dare I say, most telling) Tim Pawlenty, Hoffman has  lured significant financial support from deep-pocketed outside groups like Club for Growth whose PACs have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of ad buys in the district.

The investment is not only paying off for Hoffman, but also will hopefully teach the national Republican Party leaders an important lesson: the campaign principles that elected the class of ‘94 were broken over time, and it is the responsibility of the future GOP to rebuild on a platform that is accountable to a time-tested vision of conservatism. And, across the country, from Florida to Pennsylvania, Nevada to Wisconsin, Ohio to California, candidates are emerging with a message offering higher taxes and big government; the GOP must support candidates who provide an alternative vision that promotes personal freedom, individual liberty, and a path to economic prosperity based on job creation in lieu of promising everyone benefits out of the public treasury.

It is an embarrassment that the rushed selection of Scozzafava by the 23rd Congressional District Republican County Chairs overseen by the New York State GOP quickly and rashly selected a candidate who supports card check, has been previously endorsed by ACORN’s ‘Working Families Party,’ and is a tax-and-spender straight out of Albany.  The greater travesty is that the NRCC, with its hands tied to the Republican Party line, continues to spend money to elect a Republican that lacks any conservative credentials, while simultaneously the national party encourages donations to fight ACORN, and stop the endless spending in Washington.

Furthermore, the race highlights the GOP’s inability of adopting lessons learned – even if they’re from a recent election in the district next door!  The special election in NY-20 this past March demonstrated an important lesson for the GOP; after much waffling, it was only after the Republican candidate Assemblyman Tedisco came out against the stimulus that he began to gain significant traction.  Alas, his slow-off-the-start pro-growth economic stance was too little, too late – and the election was handed to the Democrats, stripping New York of yet another Republican seat.  Lesson learned: promote candidates who support party principles.   The New York GOP instead turned a blind eye and continued more of the same by selecting Scozzafava for the Republican ticket.

While American Maggie recognizes the importance of generally expanding the Republican Party tent and seeks to promote and support outstanding female candidates, it is critically important that candidates are both substantive and principled. Scozzafava lacks both substance and principles as she continuously struggles to define her views to her constituents.  And in Scozzafava’s case, it is not a question of her disagreeing with Republicans on a handful of issues, she breaks party line on nearly every policy issue in today’s headlines.

While Dede Scozzafava’s career as a female politician in Albany should inspire young women to engage in the political process and enter public service, this path should not be at the cost of principles.  The path out of the wilderness for the GOP will not come by electing Republicans who support the tax-and-spend, big government policies of Obama, Pelosi and Reid.

******

Elise M. Stefanik is President and Founder of American Maggie.  She previously served in the Bush Administration’s Office of the Chief of Staff.  She worked on the NY-20 special election in 2009, and grew up spending her summers in Congressional District NY-23.