Archive for November, 2009
Hillary and Sarah’s Common Theme
Monday, November 9th, 2009The Rising Tide of the GOP Youth
Friday, November 6th, 2009Meg Whitman Lead Growing for CA Governor
Thursday, November 5th, 2009Stepping Into the Arena: Encouraging Women to Run for Office
Thursday, November 5th, 2009There was no lifelong dream fueling my entry into politics, I entered politics as a reaction to what was going on in my life at that time. I was a mother of three daughters under age 4, working as a law clerk at the state Supreme Court and handling my life. One day, my husband, a physician received a call about the need to get involved in a battle at the state legislature- a battle that affected our very livelihood. That was my call to action. And, I have never looked back.
It was never my dream to be in politics….NEVER ! My life’s plan was to raise my family and practice law. Now, this is not to say that I was not involved in the process: I voted in every election, I was a member of the TARs (Teen Aged Republicans) in the late ‘60’s and I volunteered in some campaigns for my friends’ fathers. But, not me- a life of politics was not something I planned. Often people plan a career around running for office; for others, making the decision to run is sometimes a gut reaction to what is going on in your arena. That call rocked my world- and changed it.
My first campaign was successful despite my lack of campaign knowledge and experience so I offer some suggestions for making the decision to run.
1) Know your strengths and weaknesses as well as those of your potential opponents
In today’s world of social media, any photo that was ever taken of you can be posted. You certainly do not want a ”Paris Hilton moment” or even something less risqué. Remember, jilted fiancés, angry neighbors, and disgruntled employees all have a means by which to torpedo your aspirations.
2) Be able to answer the question: Why are you running ?
Ted Kennedy’s Presidential aspirations imploded when he could not answer the question: “Why are you running?” If you are not able to state at least one good reason you are running then you should not be running. This is not only because you need to answer that question in public but you need to answer that question for yourself. My first election was for the New Orleans City Council and I ran because I was raising my children in a City with the nation’s highest crime rate and I wanted them to be safe, I was scared. They say if good people who have the knowledge and ability to serve don’t run for office, then you get second rate politicians. Bad politicians usually result in bad government.
3) Prepare your family and friends.
Have a real, heart-to-heart, conversation with your family. Let them know what to expect and warn them that the campaign can get nasty. My daughters were in high school and college when I ran for the United States Senate, and even at that age, they were not prepared to see their mother get hurt in a campaign. Also, remember your family is your refuge. I have a few “home rules.” First, don’t make the campaign the center of your life at home. (Tivo/DVR is great for not being bombarded with negative ads.) Second, try to have at least one meal a day at home with your family, it keeps you grounded and they know that they are an important part of your life; and, third, try to never miss an athletic event or school function. Remember: someone has to be the mother and, no matter how equal your marriage, it is usually the woman.
Your friends are hard because in the early stages you have to depend on them for your initial support, your seed money and your first open houses. When you ask a friend for help you can feel as if you are imposing and, even though a person is your personal friend, they may not be your political friend.
4) Learn to raise money.
Only once in my political career have I used a professional fundraiser and that was in a race for the United States Senate; but, I have never had trouble asking for money. How to ask? Practice. Fundraising is something that can be learned by raising money for a candidate, your children’s school, a non-profit in your area, or a cause that is important to you. Once you learn how to ask and sell that product, you learn to ask and sell yourself. Donors love to be in contact with the potential candidate and you have to be ready for rejection. If someone says no, don’t write them off, go back. It is always surprising who will give you money and for what reason.
5) Be a filter.
Throughout your planning and decision making process, be prepared to filter the information you are receiving. You will hear all kinds of rumors, receive all sorts of advice, and all kinds of people will want to help. Use your filtering system to determine what is important and what is not- is it really important that your potential opponent is at a school fair? It depends.
Is the campaign consultant who ran your Congresswoman’s campaign the best person for your judgeship race? Maybe not. Ultimately, you are the best judge, filter the information and trust your gut.
6) Don’t run to gain name recognition.
I have heard time and again about people running for office knowing they cannot win in order to build name recognition. Don’t do it! Why put your family and friends through a campaign if you know you won’t win just to build name ID? There are plenty of ways to build name ID in your community. You can help in the aforementioned fundraising efforts, you can help another candidate (that also gets that person’s supporters on your side), you can get involved in your church or neighborhood group. But, don’t put yourself, your friends and your family through a campaign you know you can’t win just to build a name.
7) Be prepared to lose.
The first time I asked myself the question “What happens if I lose?” It was the night before my first election- it was a question I should have asked before I qualified. You never want to lose, but you need to know what can happen if you do. Will you lose your job? Will you lose clients? What will you do after the campaign? How will your family fare?
Losing is a reality because someone has to lose. It is important to remember that an election doesn’t reflect on your worth but is merely a day in the life of the community. It depends who turned out, what they were thinking, what was on the news the night before, etc. Be prepared for the good and the bad.
It is important that good, conservative women enter the political arena at all levels. My convictions are stronger now than ever. And like so many women out there, I do not believe that Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer speak for me. Now, the question remains: will we sit on the sidelines, accept the status quo and wait for someone else to step up? Or are we going to answer the call ?
******
Suzanne Haik Terrell is the Founder and Co-Chairman of Project GOPink. A lawyer by training, Terrell has served in appointed and elected office. Elected statewide in 1999, Terrell remains the only Republican woman ever elected to statewide office in Louisiana. In 2002, she won the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate and lost in the closely watched national campaign against the Democratic incumbent. The race was historic for the fact that it was the first Senate race in history with two women representing their respective parties. Terrell lives in New Orleans with her husband of more than thirty years, they have three daughters.
Getting Their Priorities Right: H1N1 Vaccinations and GITMO Detainees
Thursday, November 5th, 2009Since when do prisoners and suspected terrorists receive better treatment than law abiding citizens?
That is the question that many Americans are asking after a recent acknowledgement that Guantanamo Bay prisoners may have the option of receiving H1N1 vaccinations, beginning early this month.
Earlier this week Army Maj. James Crabtree stated that GITMO prisoners could have the option of receiving inoculations against the swine flu. His reasoning rests on the fact that H1N1 spreads more rapidly among those living in close quarters, and because GITMO detainees reside in such circumstances, they are at risk individuals. There is also the argument that inmates must receive vaccinations in order to protect the welfare of guards patrolling the detention center.
However, would it not be more effective and widely accepted to instead simply vaccinate the guards on duty rather than extending treatments to 200 detainees? While these inmate doses are not mandatory, the idea that H1N1 prevention mechanisms are available for suspected terrorists, shocked many flu frenzied individuals.
Coinciding with civilian concerns was the announcement that GITMO detainees will not, in fact, receive vaccinations against H1N1. According to an article in Reuters, published this morning, the White House denied, on Tuesday that “any H1N1 flu vaccine is now going to terrorism suspects held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba.” Finally the response Americans were hoping for, right? Wrong! Subsequent to that statement was a rebuttal from Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman who stated that “detainees at Guantanamo would receive the vaccine only after active duty troops, deployed U.S. contractors and civilians and civilians working for the Department of Defense.” This sudden revocation of the idea that vaccines would be given to GITMO detainees bears some level of suspicion. I think that many would agree that past and current White House administrations have a knack for promising one thing and doing another.
Concerns from American citizens following this announcement still remain are not unwarranted. Federal officials initially estimated a production of 40 million doses by the end of October. Never the less, they have since rescinded their approximation to 26 million doses. Health officials have combated such facts with claims that there are adequate vaccination reserves. Officials now report an estimated 30 million doses of H1N1 vaccines that have been delivered to the U.S. Yet, health officials also warn that children under the age of nine need 2 doses of the vaccine to ensure adequate protection. Assuming that children receive the majority of vaccinations, this means that really only 15 million Americans can receive the vaccine.
While it has been reported that vaccine production and distribution is steadily increasing, it is difficult to completely side with health officials who assert such a claim when you look at communities that simply do not have enough available H1N1 vaccinations. According to a recent report by ABC anchor Veronique Masterson, numerous hospitals in the border city of El Paso, Texas, find it difficult to secure enough inoculations for health care workers. While the concern lies in the best interest of the hospital employees themselves, there is also concern about the effect on visiting patients. Without protecting health officials who interact with patients who may have weak immune systems or other deficits, we are, in effect putting others at risk.
Our federal government needs to reevaluate its priority lists with regard to who receives H1N1 vaccinations. Cynicism can be a form of prudence, and in the case regarding whether or not GITMO detainees may receive H1N1 vaccinations, I think it is fair to assume that such individuals will, in fact, be recipients of the vaccine. If protecting suspected terrorists supercedes the importance of preserving innocent American civilians, the U.S. government needs to adjust their focus and take a course in proper risk assessment.
******
Kathleen Someah previously attended Kenyon College where she studied English and Political Science. She is currently an intern with a political think tank where she focuses primarily on issues relating to homeland security
Why I Vote Republican….It Isn’t Social Issues
Monday, November 2nd, 2009I am a graduate of a liberal women’s college in Massachusetts (Mount Holyoke). My mother is a school teacher (part of the NEA), and many of my relatives have worked for a union. Sounds like a liberal, huh?
Guess what – I vote Republican. Why? I believe in personal responsibility and the power of hard work. I believe that a child of any race, religion, or gender can realize his/her dreams in this country, and that is worth protecting. I believe in the power of free markets, entrepreneurism, and small business. I believe in a strong national defense policy. I know that you don’t create jobs or wealth through taxes and massive bureaucracy. In short, I support Republican candidates because of fiscal issues, not social issues, and there are a lot of people like me.
I am deeply frustrated that both parties assume that women are narrow-minded and only vote on issues like abortion, and the environment (although, admittedly, I know plenty of women that fit the bill…). I care as much about the environment as the next person, but I also care about a candidate’s economic plan, and Creigh Deeds doesn’t have one. Am I supposed to overlook that minor, little issue because I’m a “girl?” Sorry, but I’ll be voting for Bob McDonnell and Barbara Comstock on November 3rd. I don’t agree with Bob and Barbara on every issue, but they have real plans for job growth and transportation in Virginia, and that matters to me.
The bottom line is that Republicans do not all look the same. We vary by age, race, religion, gender and social beliefs. We are just as worried about the environment, poverty, healthcare, and women as Democrats…we just don’t think that massive government expansion and feel good sound bites are the best solution to those problems.
From Blue to Red: The GOP 2009 Comeback in NJ and VA
Monday, November 2nd, 2009It’s the scenario every political buff loves: off-year elections right after a new Democratic president has been elected; elections that could very likely swing against said president’s party, no less. The suspense rises, and the speculation abounds, as analysts, pundits, and politicians alike anxiously await the outcome of the governor races in New Jersey, Virginia, and the Congressional race in New York district 23.
In Virginia, it looks as if Republican Bob McDonnell is all but assured an easy victory against his Democratic opponent, Creigh Deeds. A recent Rasmussen report indicates McDonnell has a 13-point lead. This is significant, in a state that went blue in 2006 and 2008, when its Democratic Governor Tim Kaine declared that the “Old Virginny is dead.” Well, the “Old Virginny” (whatever that means) is on its way back from the land of the dead. Or so it seems.
When the Old Dominion voted for Barack Obama in 2008, it was the first time the state went for a Democratic presidential candidate since Lyndon Johnson. In other words, it was a big deal. However, it’s an even bigger deal now that only one year later, the state has apparently had a change of heart. One could call it the ultimate slap in the face for Barack Obama. The state that borders Washington, DC apparently doesn’t like what it’s been seeing from across the Potomac.
New Jersey is another story. The governor’s seat is being battled over by Republican and former federal prosecutor Chris Christie and former U.S. Senator, former Goldman Sachs chairman, and incumbent Governor John Corzine. Corzine should really be a shoo-in for the dark, dark blue state. But again, the fact that the race is neck and neck speaks volumes about the Democrat’s agenda in Congress and the White House.
The race also reflects the shift in American’s attitudes concerning personal finances and taxes. Tax cuts have been the prevalent theme in Christie’s campaign and it appears most New Jerseyans are in favor of that. As well they should be, considering that New Jersey citizens are the highest taxed citizens in the country.
And unfortunately for him, Corzine did nothing to fix that. Nor has President Obama’s push for healthcare reform helped Corzine in any way. When taxes are clearly the main issue, revealing a reform bill that many say will raise taxes on the middle class was largely a strategic misdirection on the part of Democrats who would actually like to see Corzine reelected.
The New York Congressional race in the 23rd District also has political junkies salivating over poll numbers, party identifications and predictions. Like Virginia and New Jersey, this race has the potential to send a big message to Washington D.C. Yet this race is marked by one stark contrast. The two major runners are Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman and Democrat Bill Owens. Republican Dede Scozzafava was rejected by voters early on, and has already dropped out of the race.
Like New Jersey, this race is in a dead heat, with polls showing Hoffman and Owens with a narrow lead, depending on which one you look at. The remarkable thing about this election though, is that it is becoming the ultimate testing ground for conservative ideals. In recent weeks, notable Republicans from former presidential candidate Fred Thompson, to U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC), to vice presidential nominee and former Governor Sarah Palin, endorsed Hoffman over Scozzafava. Why? Because Hoffman truly represents conservative values like limited government, low taxes and individual liberty.
In every way, this race from upstate New York will help redefine the national GOP; a party that has strayed from conservative values for far too long. But that could all be changing now. In 2008, when John McCain (a moderate Republican, at best) won the party’s nomination, advocates argued all conservatives should support him because well, he was the Republican candidate.
But now, having an “R” next to your name is no longer the single qualifier for support from conservatives, as Ms. Scozzafava found out. What matters is principles, ideas and values; not party identification. The mindset of “I’m a conservative first, Republican second,” is making a comeback with the American public, as it should.
Whether it’s New York, Virginia, or New Jersey, each race this year could have a major impact on the 2010 elections. As more and more Democrats in Congress worry about their seats, they are going to be less willing to agree to work with President Obama on certain things like, say, healthcare.
******
Amanda Carey is the Editor of The Tiger Town Observer at Clemson University. She has previously worked for Robert Novak and has been published in Reason Magazine and The American Spectator.
