<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the GOP Website is Bad for Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/</link>
	<description>An Online Platform For Conservative Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:03:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Verona Martucci</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Verona Martucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-267</guid>
		<description>bookmarked this at MyWebDesktop (never heard of it? then A collaboration and communication tool, designed to be as generic and easy to use as a telephone and email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bookmarked this at MyWebDesktop (never heard of it? then A collaboration and communication tool, designed to be as generic and easy to use as a telephone and email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ballet shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>ballet shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-264</guid>
		<description>The information presented is top notch. I&#039;ve been doing some research on the topic and this post answered several questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The information presented is top notch. I&#8217;ve been doing some research on the topic and this post answered several questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loopzy</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>loopzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GOP Website is a Barrel of Yawns &#171; Skyla Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>The GOP Website is a Barrel of Yawns &#171; Skyla Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] the U.S. House of Representatives&#8230; .&#8221; I&#8217;ve complained a lot about the website in recent weeks, but I AM very happy to see the GOP upgrading (and, granted, this is a beta, so hopefully great [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the U.S. House of Representatives&#8230; .&#8221; I&#8217;ve complained a lot about the website in recent weeks, but I AM very happy to see the GOP upgrading (and, granted, this is a beta, so hopefully great [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alba</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Alba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Hi ... I stumbled on your website by mistake.  I was looking in Yahoo for PDF software that I had already bought when I found your site, I must say your page is pretty informative, I just love the theme, its amazing!. I don&#039;t have the time at the moment to totally read your site but I bookmarked it and also will sign up for your RSS feed. I will be back in a day or two. Thanks again for a awesome site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8230; I stumbled on your website by mistake.  I was looking in Yahoo for PDF software that I had already bought when I found your site, I must say your page is pretty informative, I just love the theme, its amazing!. I don&#8217;t have the time at the moment to totally read your site but I bookmarked it and also will sign up for your RSS feed. I will be back in a day or two. Thanks again for a awesome site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why the GOP Website is Bad for Women : NO QUARTER</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Why the GOP Website is Bad for Women : NO QUARTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] from AmericanMaggie.com with the express permission of its founderSkyla Freeman. American Maggie is Web site for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from AmericanMaggie.com with the express permission of its founderSkyla Freeman. American Maggie is Web site for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barb2009</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>barb2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Leah, you have the right idea. Since we are 51% of population and it was the Republican Party who championed Suffrage - we have a tradition here. We ned more republican women in the Senate. I am so ready to light the fire for more of us in power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leah, you have the right idea. Since we are 51% of population and it was the Republican Party who championed Suffrage &#8211; we have a tradition here. We ned more republican women in the Senate. I am so ready to light the fire for more of us in power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barb2009</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>barb2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 04:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-195</guid>
		<description>This is an insightful and informative article.  Has the RNC corrected this on the website? I would think they would if they want to enhance the status of women in the party. I have been hearing that there is a new look at women in the republican party. (Considering we are 51% of the population it&#039;s about time.) The new female leadership in the party is a breath of fresh air - it helps all women regardless of party. It helps our country. 

I hope next time I go to GOP.com I am pleasantly surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an insightful and informative article.  Has the RNC corrected this on the website? I would think they would if they want to enhance the status of women in the party. I have been hearing that there is a new look at women in the republican party. (Considering we are 51% of the population it&#8217;s about time.) The new female leadership in the party is a breath of fresh air &#8211; it helps all women regardless of party. It helps our country. </p>
<p>I hope next time I go to GOP.com I am pleasantly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.americanmaggie.com/2009/10/23/why-the-gop-website-is-bad-for-women/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanmaggie.com/?p=876#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Skyla, this is very well written &amp; I have to agree 100%.   The RNC has not made it a point to celebrate the good female base that we have.   With voter turnout getting more &amp; more apathetic this IS the time to light a fire under the women (&amp; all voter really) who are feeling disenfranchised.   They need to know our tradition here &amp; that it is one to be proud of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skyla, this is very well written &amp; I have to agree 100%.   The RNC has not made it a point to celebrate the good female base that we have.   With voter turnout getting more &amp; more apathetic this IS the time to light a fire under the women (&amp; all voter really) who are feeling disenfranchised.   They need to know our tradition here &amp; that it is one to be proud of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
